![]() ![]() They've already gone with some multi-threading so a bit of the overhead involved with that is already there. They choose not to do so, for better and worse. ![]() Those 30% of processors that do not have 4 cores include a lot of low end CPUs, some of them might actually have the potential throughput to handle this game if all of their cores are permitted to help out. The term "low end" and the term "quad core" might overlap, but they're not identical. My point is just that in the article they suggest that the game only utilizing 4 cores is a good thing for *low end* CPUs. That would increase the performance on CPUs such as the FX series 83 as well as older CPUs such as the 1090T.Īnd those optimizations could be carried on with the next round of engine upgrades as we now have hex core processors both on AMD and Intels side that's actually *good*.Ģ0737464 said:"Quad-core CPUs are installed in more than two-thirds of surveyed systems (70%, to be exact)." That is the reason the game is optimized for fewer cores. Now granted, one argument for optimizing for fewer cores is that there's some overhead involved with increasing the thread count.īut still, this is 2018, surely they can do 6 threads with a low workload on each. It's more important that the workload *on* those threads is low as that would both allow CPUs with fewer cores to more easily keep up with the ones with many cores as well as allow those with slow cores to keep up with those with fewer faster ones.Īs is this thing is optimized for the i5 and i3 CPUs from Intel. Hum, there's a lot of multi-core low end CPUs out there, especially from AMD.įor those the lack of utilization of more then 4 threads is bad news, not good news with this title. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |